McCain Shows Strength on Free Trade
For all his “triangulating” tendencies, Senator McCain has stood strongly in the conservative corner on the issue of trade. McCain recently visited
« June 22, 2008 - June 28, 2008 | Main | July 6, 2008 - July 12, 2008 »
For all his “triangulating” tendencies, Senator McCain has stood strongly in the conservative corner on the issue of trade. McCain recently visited
So, the Dow is now officially in bear territory. Unemployment is stuck at a mediocre 5.5%, and the economy shed another 62,000 jobs last month.
Sounds like it's the perfect time to raise the capital gains and dividends tax.
Huh?
Well, that's what Barack Obama says he wants to do. He'd raise the dividends tax rate from 15% to 39.6%. He'd raise the capital gains tax rate from 15% to as high as 28% (his words).
Nothing like kicking investors when we're down.
Ben Stein has an op-ed in today's NYT that repeats an old saw: real wages are stagnant for private sector employees since 1970. Unfortunately, this analysis ignores several factors:
The bottom line is that this is not a problem. People are making choices for themselves that make sense for their household, even if it might not look good in the aggregate.
There's some argument to be made that single-earner breadwinners cannot be assured of a "family wage," but that's only if you ratchet up the definition of what a family "needs." A single earner can certainly support a family using a 1965 basket of goods and services. It's only when you add in the deluxe cable package, the third bathroom, and the fourth car that things get problematic here.
WSJ today has a report on how America's investor class is preparing for an uncertain death tax world. Here's a snippet:
Analysts at Deloitte Tax estimate the federal estate tax for a hypothetical $5 million estate under the McCain plan would be $675,000 less for 2009 than under the Obama plan. For a $10 million estate, the savings under the McCain plan would be nearly $2.2 million. For a $50 million estate, the difference would be more than $14 million. For a $100 million estate, the difference would be more than $29 million. (These numbers reflect federal tax only; many states levy their own taxes.)
Still think the election doesn't matter?
Today appears to be international tax day at the WSJ.
First, there's an editorial on how Europeans can escape their confiscatory tax regimes, while U.S. entrepreneurs are stuck.
Also, there's a great retrospective on the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which resulted in a $300 billion infusion of capital into the United States.
Is your business being hindered by high corporate tax rates? If so, you can always take your money overseas. So long as you don’t come back…
The
The
The Chamber last week received a letter from the Department of Labor clarifying that pension plan fiduciaries cannot, consistent with ERISA, "increase expenses, sacrifice investment returns, or reduce the security of plan benefits in order to promote or oppose union organizing goals or collective bargaining objectives."
In other words, pension fund administrators have one duty--maximizing investment returns. Shortchanging retirees and future retirees in order to advance secondary goals is a violation of the law. That won't stop unions from trying, though.
On Friday, ASA released its 2007 "Friend of the Shareholder" awards. We should have pictures up soon. For now, we have the House abstracts, the Senate abstracts, and the scorecard itself.
José Piñera, former Chilean secretary of labor and social security, was a key player in the personalization of Chile’s social security system. He recently discussed the system’s success:
Chile allowed every worker to choose whether to stay in the state-run, pay-as-you-go social security system or to put the whole payroll tax into an individual retirement account. For the first time in history we have allowed the common worker to benefit from one of the most powerful forces on earth: compound interest.
Some 93% of Chilean workers chose the new system. They trust the private sector and prefer market risk to political risk. If you invest money in the market, it could go up or down. Over a 40-year period, though, a diversified portfolio will have very low risk and provide a positive rate of real return. But when the government runs the pension system, it can slash benefits at any time.
There have been enormous external benefits: the savings rate of
Chile was 10% of gross national product traditionally. It has gone up to 27% of GNP. The payroll tax in Chile is zero. Of course we have an estate tax and an income tax, but not a payroll tax. With full employment and a 27% savings rate, the rate of growth of the Chilean economy has doubled. That does not mean that we do not have any problems in
Chile, but I believe that a society based on individual freedoms -- economic, social and political -- is a much more prosperous and lively society.
John C. Bogle: Common Sense on Mutual Funds: New Imperatives for the Intelligent Investor
Richard Yancey: Confessions of a Tax Collector: One Man's Tour of Duty Inside the IRS
Harvey Mackay: Dig Your Well Before You're Thirsty : The Only Networking Book You'll Ever Need
Grover Norquist: Leave Us Alone: Getting the Government's Hands Off Our Money, Our Guns, Our Lives
Paul Craig Roberts: Supply-Side Revolution: An Insider's Account of Policymaking in Washington
Julian E. Zelizer: Taxing America: Wilbur D. Mills, Congress, and the State, 1945-1975
Recent Comments