Governor Romney's Tax Plan: Reducing the Tax Burden on Savings and Investment
By Jeremy Sawyer • Friday, August 17, 2012 4:57 am
Capital income is important to the health of the American economy. Many experts recognize that lawmakers should do everything in their power to encourage entrepreneurs to take risks by allowing them to keep more of their money when those risks pay off in the form of capital gains. Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron notes that taxing capital income “punishes labor effort and savings…savings finances capital formation and research and development, which are crucial for economic growth.”
Predictably, President Obama and Congressional Democrats are plotting a massive tax hike on capital income in 2013. Under the current law being defended by Democrats, the lowest rate on short-term capital gains would jump from 10 percent to 15 percent while the top rate would increase from 35 percent to 39.6 percent as short-term capital gains would cease to be distinguished from ordinary income. A new surtax on investment income in Obamacare is set to bring the effective top rate to an unacceptably high 43.4 percent.
Long-term capital gains, a category that includes dividends, would also see large tax hikes. A 10 percent rate would be imposed on taxpayers in the bottom two income tax brackets, the members of which currently pay no taxes on long-term capital gains, and the rate facing all other taxpayers would increase from 15 percent to 20 percent.
Governor Romney understands the need to reduce the tax burden on savings and investment. For this reason, he has proposed maintaining current rates on capital income for taxpayers earning more than $200,000 annually and eliminating the tax on those who earn less than that amount.
An examination of historical data reveals that reducing the tax burden on capital income is likely to strengthen the economy. The graph above shows that the growth of real private investment is significantly correlated with a low average effective tax rate on short-term capital gains. The data show a similar correlation for the rate on long-term capital gains as well, with a correlation coefficient of 0.45.
Investment is hugely consequential because it is the most volatile component of GDP. Consumption, roughly 70 percent of GDP, is fairly constant. Yet investment can jump rapidly and, in doing so, boost output in a major way.
In addition to correlating with higher investment, low taxes on capital income are also correlated with higher saving rates. Over the period from 1954 to 2008, the correlation coefficient for gross private saving relative to a linear model of its growth and the average effective tax rate on short-term capital gains is a remarkable 0.53. When the relative growth of private saving is compared with the long-term capital gains rate, the number is 0.49.
Saving is also good for the economy in the long run because it means capital will be available for future investments. As economist Adolfo Laurenti says, “savings are always good” because they lead to “a better and strong economy.”
The best policy with regard to taxes on capital income would be a rate of zero for all taxpayers, because eliminating the tax entirely would provide a major shot in the arm to the U.S. economy. Governor Romney’s plan would only bring the rate to zero for taxpayers in the three lowest brackets; those whose income places them in the top three brackets would not benefit from marginal incentive effects. Nonetheless, enacting the plan would reduce the average effective rate on capital income and provide the benefit of a zero marginal rate on capital gains for the vast majority of Americans.
Economics is about incentives, and reducing the tax burden on capital income will clearly incentivize more investment and more saving. Governor Romney’s plan for capital income taxes is a step towards Reagan-style growth.
This content is provided by Americans for Tax Reform Foundation. To donate to ATRF, click here.
Posted by Jeremy Sawyer on Friday, August 17, 2012 4:57 PM EDT
Comments (9)
Post Your Comment
I use Oanda to do my trading. Oanda and FXCM are the only two I know to be legit, and I chose Oanda for its ease of use (fully amttuaoed trading via a graphic user interface - point and click). Another great thing about Oanda is that their game accounts never expire, unlike most brokers who offer game accounts for 30 days only. A game account is the essential starting point (unless you don't mind losing money). Let me know if you have other questions!
>> Pankaj October 12, 2012 2:22 pm
Ya1eUB , [url=http://ieorfoixrqlk.com/]ieorfoixrqlk[/url], [link=http://rgjgtrmrlrlx.com/]rgjgtrmrlrlx[/link], http://cgnzhrrobcpl.com/
>> dtwurvt October 14, 2012 1:11 am
ksb5RL tssxiwijsyfp
>> glpcbjke October 15, 2012 9:53 am
Zf2ZFp , [url=http://xjgkigtikfig.com/]xjgkigtikfig[/url], [link=http://skxwcamrozpm.com/]skxwcamrozpm[/link], http://ntksdewagsma.com/
>> ihbxoypdki October 15, 2012 8:28 pm
Swinked - I think you're going to enjoy forex once you get the hang of it. Be sure to search aurnod the web and read everything you can about it while you're running your game account. It can take a while to get the hang of this, but once you start to, you pick it up pretty fast. Good luck!
>> Drew November 3, 2012 2:02 am
aykSBT waiuxltvrdax
>> bdayxq November 3, 2012 5:10 pm
cxAfYS , [url=http://oysvthsxmqoc.com/]oysvthsxmqoc[/url], [link=http://ucmbdrownshr.com/]ucmbdrownshr[/link], http://faflylfazjjp.com/
>> iofevcrbcjt November 5, 2012 12:17 am
lhExgn embppbhtjsxe
>> akjytasvau November 7, 2012 8:49 am
y4WzXB , [url=http://molvcorwfynt.com/]molvcorwfynt[/url], [link=http://juncpdcbvavp.com/]juncpdcbvavp[/link], http://rfpxxxdyhtsp.com/
>> vfnhthtda November 7, 2012 5:23 pm
Add a Comment