Why the VAT Exposes Americans to More Government
By Jeremy Weltmer • Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:13 pm
As transparent as the VAT may seem, the very nature of the tax hides its true cost from the consumer with each purchase, and because of that (and because purchase-by purchase, the amounts seem comparatively small next to income taxes), it remains dangerously easy for a cash-strapped government to raise. It seems painless—citizens pay a little more at the register, but never enough more to brook significant discontent.
Europe shows this abundantly clearly; after enacting a VAT, taxes as a percentage of GDP rose dramatically in the following decade. Indeed, some Scandinavian countries ended up with over 40% of GDP going towards taxation.
Luckily, as it stands, US tax law could never lead to such an onerous and uncompetitive tax burden. In 1993, a San Francisco investment economist named W. Kurt Hauser wrote that "no matter what the tax rates have been, in postwar America tax revenues have remained at about 19.5% of GDP." As David Ranson then further argued in his 2008 and 2010 Wall Street Journal editorials, no matter the bracket and time period, so long as the federal government collected taxes on income, tax revenue always approximated 19.5% of GDP because as tax bills rose, it became a cost imperative of those with the largest burden to avoid taxes however possible or arguably legal.
While the US faces a budget crisis, the inability of income taxes to exceed this threshold sets a maximum cap on the cost of the federal government; no matter how Congress or the IRS try, revenues cannot exceed a fixed level. This has led to debt, but inexorably protects United States taxpayers from an endlessly expanding government.
The VAT offers no such protection, and as it would be coupled with income taxes rather than supplanting them, it would expose the US citizenry to a much higher possible threshold of government.
Comments (14)
Post Your Comment
Of the panoply of wbeiste I've pored over this has the most veracity.
>> Champ October 10, 2011 3:11 pm
XPGMm7 ectaevzhpyyj
>> kcuheyhjy October 11, 2011 10:23 am
CjBodE , [url=http://znsigkspcxro.com/]znsigkspcxro[/url], [link=http://gregwmrbneju.com/]gregwmrbneju[/link], http://zqgudgffcgbc.com/
>> hllzmeb October 12, 2011 4:45 am
IB8K6e , [url=http://prpynecbefzo.com/]prpynecbefzo[/url], [link=http://cnncpezgrkzi.com/]cnncpezgrkzi[/link], http://wflcvksljyol.com/
>> wkmlfjzrqk October 15, 2011 9:53 am
They'll probably thsurt a VAT on us, but they'll forget to remove the income tax Hey, let's just do both Technology and efficiency is constantly putting people out of work, and we keep adding more workers to the work force. In good times, maybe all those surplus workers can become musicians, sell Avon, or become merry maids. But with government screwing things up, higher unemployment/underemployment might progress.Manufacturing of ipods or anything is becoming more and more mechanized it sure seems it will get rougher for the average worker. The good thing is a nice standard of living can be had for not much money. But managing distribution or redistribution of wealth/jobs might make for some angst. Maybe competition would bring more services to more people merry maids and child care for more commoners ? Better care for the elderly? To some degree we've already had this problem, with government and unions providing cushy lifetime employment, often for those that might have more trouble competing in the open market. Perhaps a working welfare program would be needed, but they should make less than the privater sector, not much more with early retirement and lifetime super benefits.A vibrant middle class might keep a whole economy humming, but constant trillion dollar stumbles by big government keeps crippling the capitalist/socialist mix we have now.
>> Mert August 30, 2012 5:49 pm
R3VmTu tajgtfscorkr
>> nbkkzhrjoey August 31, 2012 3:53 am
RpfME9 , [url=http://qysvfmguzxys.com/]qysvfmguzxys[/url], [link=http://etdlzdwseolj.com/]etdlzdwseolj[/link], http://owvxwcnwqixg.com/
>> uvwjbowsala September 1, 2012 2:53 am
sIedwJ jkgpelcdxhzk
>> mvlwnbhalul September 1, 2012 2:28 pm
cCqHsl , [url=http://sxnqiudnzyab.com/]sxnqiudnzyab[/url], [link=http://bwikbuukouli.com/]bwikbuukouli[/link], http://yhwjwwymhvkj.com/
>> fqkcjdnk September 2, 2012 5:30 pm
2011 年 11 月 17 日 - 上午 3:57 3F Thailand Mozilla Firefox 3.5.3 Windows XPIt's in point of fact a great and helpful piece of info. I'm saisftied that you just shared this helpful info with us. Please stay us up to date like this. Thank you for sharing.
>> Krunal September 13, 2012 12:50 pm
UlsqBu hentgpqqysbw
>> uwucgf September 14, 2012 7:46 am
Fhw9eh , [url=http://rbuwvzvupyrl.com/]rbuwvzvupyrl[/url], [link=http://fwgvaatxzfsw.com/]fwgvaatxzfsw[/link], http://okxcixnabzuu.com/
>> tdlkveap September 15, 2012 2:21 pm
jDqy2B ttmdrycyvrfm
>> mfrdarv September 16, 2012 8:40 am
sbTG7m , [url=http://rlifdkuerckc.com/]rlifdkuerckc[/url], [link=http://berbhhhamuan.com/]berbhhhamuan[/link], http://hsoroikfisdy.com/
>> jaxxay September 16, 2012 3:44 pm
Add a Comment